LEAs, child care programs, and programs may use the following process to establish a partnership. As a community trends, the needs of children and families, and the availability of resources can change, so it is essential that this process is continuous and cyclical.
LEAs, child care programs, and Head Start programs should collect and analyze data to better understand the local, early-childhood landscape. Understanding the landscape may help determine if a partnership can address family needs and which partnership model(s) would work best for the entities involved.
Collect data to help inform the partnership planning process. Potential data to inform partnerships can include:
Data | Providing Entity |
| Enrollment gaps of eligible three-year-old children | LEAs |
| Enrollment gaps of eligible four-year-old children | LEAs |
| Needs of local families (for example, full-day programming and/or additional, comprehensive services | LEAs, Census, Local Workforce Boards, or Head Start Programs |
| Wait Lists | Local Workforce Boards, Head Start Programs, or High Quality Child Care Programs |
| Underserved sections of neighborhoods, communities, and/or school districts | Census, Community Organizations City, or County Government |
| District capacity to serve eligible three- and four- year-old children | LEAs |
| Differences in program standards and requirements between LEAs and child care programs | LEAs, Head Start Programs, High Quality Child Care Programs |
| Child care program and Head Start program capacity to serve eligible children (classroom space, committed leadership, dedicated staff to oversee partnership, number or availability of certified teachers, etc.) | Local Workforce Boards, Head Start Programs, High Quality Child Care Programs |
| Quality of child care programs and Head Start programs | Local Workforce Boards, Head Start State Collaboration Office, In-Person Visit to Provider, or Discussion with Community Partners |
| Availability of additional funding for eligible children (for example: childcare subsidies or Head Start funding) | LEAs, Local Workforce Boards, or Head Start Provider |
| Local success/challenges experienced with establishing and maintaining partnerships | Early Childhood Division earlychildhoodeducation@tea.texas.gov
|
| Expenses and revenues related to partnering with an early learning program |
LEAs, child care programs, and Head Start programs should also connect with nonprofit organizations, government entities, or other key community stakeholders to better understand the early childhood landscape (e.g., local workforce development boards, nonprofit organizations or city/county government divisions involved in early childhood education, early childhood professional organizations, and/or local Child Care Regulation staff).
After analyzing local data, supports, and resources, LEAs, along with child care programs and Head Start programs, can work to identify potential partners and partnership models.
LEAs should connect with community stakeholders to identify child care programs and Head Start programs that may be interested in partnering. Early childhood community stakeholders include, but are not limited to:
LEAs may wish to hold public meetings to share information and recruit partners that meet appropriate eligibility criteria.
Child care programs that serve eligible three-year-olds must comply with licensing minimum standards, per . If a school district contracts with a private entity, the program must comply with the applicable child-care licensing standards adopted by the .
Child care programs that serve eligible four-year-olds must be licensed by and in good standing and must also meet one of the following criteria to partner with an LEA:
LEAs, child care programs, and Head Start programs have options when identifying a partnership model that fits the needs of all involved parties. Examples of partnership models:
A. Informal Partnerships
B. Formal Partnerships
C. LEA and Head Start Program Partnerships
D. LEA and Child Care Program Partnerships
E. In-district Charter School Partnerships
Many LEAs, child care programs, and Head Start programs choose to establish informal partnerships prior to or instead of establishing formal partnerships. Informal partnerships provide opportunities to collaborate and provide a strong pipeline of quality care from birth through age 5, as well as school-readiness supports. Resources shared in an informal partnership may include but are not limited to, professional development, classroom observations/assessments, alignment of curriculum and/or assessments, family engagement, and/or transitions to kindergarten.
Many LEAs, child care programs, and Head Start programs choose to establish formal partnerships, which can be onsite at an child care program, Head Start provider, or an LEA campus. In formal partnerships, children are dually enrolled, and programs combine two or more sources of funding to offer care, education, and services for children and families. The LEA may provide Foundation School Program (FSP), early education allotment, or other funding sources to cover a half-day of instruction for three-year-olds and/or a full-day of instruction for four-year-olds. In formal partnerships, partners create and establish contracts which outline services, roles, and responsibilities and ensure that all applicable program standards are met. Refer to the Developing a Partnership Contract Agreement/MOU guidance for more information about public-private prekindergarten partnership contracts.
In this model, LEAs and Head Start programs partner to provide prekindergarten and additional services. Prekindergarten and additional services can be provided onsite at the LEA or at the Head Start program. The teacher(s) may be employed by the LEA or the Head Start program.
Funding
LEA and Head Start program partnerships are funded with FSP funding, early education allotment, other available local funding sources, and Head Start program funding. LEAs may pass through funding to Head Start programs or Head Start programs may pass through funding to LEAs. The amount of funding one entity passes to the other will depend on the employer of the teacher(s) and the services provided by each entity. LEAs and Head Start programs may fund the same program hours provided that each entity meets their respective requirements and standards.
Standards and Regulations
The partnership program must meet the standards and regulations of the LEA and Head Start, including, but not limited to teacher certification/qualification requirements, curriculum, assessment, attendance procedures, classroom sizes and ratios, services provided to children and families, nutrition requirements, instructional minutes, etc. During the contract development phase, partnership program staff should work together to determine how to meet the requirements of each entity and to ensure that program staff become trained in each other’s standards and guidelines.
In this model, LEAs and child care programs partner to provide prekindergarten and additional services. Prekindergarten and additional services can be provided onsite at the LEA or at the child care program. The teacher(s) may be employed by the LEA or by the child care program.
Funding
These partnerships are funded with FSP funding, early education allotment, other available local funding sources, childcare subsidies, and/or tuition. Typically, the LEA passes through funding to the child care program. However, the amount of funding passed through depends on the employer of the teacher(s) and the services provided by each entity. Tuition and/or childcare subsidies may NOT fund hours funded by the LEA. For dually enrolled children, child care programs should contact their local workforce board to determine which childcare subsidy rate they are eligible to receive (full-time, part-time, or blended) based on the number of hours funded by the LEA.
Standards and Regulations
The partnership program must meet the standards and regulations of the LEA and the child care program, including, but not limited to teacher certification/qualification requirements, curriculum, assessment, attendance procedures, classroom sizes and ratios, services provided to children and families, nutrition requirements, instructional minutes, etc. The partnership program must also meet any applicable standards/requirements of the child care program, including, but not limited to childcare licensing standards, Texas Rising Star, Texas School Ready, , or other accreditations. During the contract development phase, partnership program staff should work together to determine how to best meet the requirements of each entity and to ensure that program staff become trained in each other’s standards, guidelines, policies, and procedures.
In this model districts may partner with a nonprofit organization, government entity, institute of higher education, or an existing charter school to provide prekindergarten and additional services. The district authorizes a carefully selected partner to operate an in- district charter school under a performance contract. The partner must have their own board of directors and hold responsibility for staff, curriculum, calendar, assessments, and other school-level decision making. The district holds the partner accountable for academic and financial performance. The process for authorizing an in-district charter campus requires the approval of several stakeholders and may extend the timeline needed to initiate a partnership program.
Funding
These partnerships are funded with FSP funding, early education allotment, and other funding that may be available to partners.
Standards and Regulations
The partnership program must meet the standards and regulations of the LEA and the child care program, including, but not limited to teacher certification/qualification requirements, curriculum, assessment, attendance procedures, classroom sizes and ratios, services provided to children and families, nutrition requirements, instructional minutes, etc. The partnership program must also meet any applicable standards/requirements of the child care programs, including, but not limited to childcare licensing standards, Texas Rising Star, Texas School Ready, NAEYC, or other accreditations. During the contract development phase, partnership program staff should work together to determine how to best meet the requirements of each entity and to ensure that program staff become trained in each other’s standards, guidelines, policies, and procedures.
Developing public-private prekindergarten partnerships takes time, trust, clear communication, and leadership committed to providing quality care and education. Building successful relationships among members of the partnership is essential to its success.
Key activities that can foster relationship building include:
When activities are organized to provide meaningful interactions between partners, parties gain insight on expectations, potential challenges, and solutions.
Creating strong relationships prior to establishing the formal partnership will allow for the formation of a successful partnership. Factors that facilitate the formation of successful partnerships include, but are not limited to, the following:
There are many factors to consider when establishing public-private partnerships. If a formal partnership is being developed, staff from both parties should work together to clarify and communicate partner needs and expectations prior to developing a contract. Staff from both parties should work collaboratively to develop a contract that outlines responsibilities, roles, requirements, and resources that are shared. Contracts should be reviewed regularly, and amendments should be made jointly and with buy-in from both partners.
Child care program contracts may include, but are not limited to the following:
Administration/Human Resources
Partnership Parameters
Support Services
Quality/Evaluation
After partnerships are formally established, staff from both parties should work together to evaluate the relationship on an ongoing basis to ensure it is successful, high-quality, and financially stable. Ongoing, clear, and open communication between partnership staff can help sustain partnerships.
Common barriers to successful partnerships include:
To evaluate partnership success and impact, consider analyzing:
To sustain and improve partnerships parties may: